首页-日语 - 地盘 - 记录 - 日志 - 下载 - 查词 - 翻译 - 排行
F8键(暂停/播放)| F9键(重复此句)| 左键或ALT+Z(上一句)| 右键或ALT+X(下一句)
听写窗口
译文窗口
注释窗口

您没有登录,系统不能保存您的听写记录和听写错词,点击此处登录

听写提交之后可查看原文
All right, so I'm gonna leave that there and we'll pick that up you know with this vice presidential debate that's coming up next week. What about the Roe V. Wade issue?
It's interesting to me that we heard Joe Biden say last night, he thinks that Amy Barrett's a fine person and you know probably would be a good judge.
We're sort of hearing them down playing this part of that issue. What do you see in that?
Can I say first of all in the Kamala Harris, just one thing there. I mean she's switching her positions.
She previously said she was open to packing the court. Now she won't answer the question.
She's got a lot of things to answer for and I'd like her to take a pledge Senator Harris.
I'd like her to say that she's not gonna continue to engage in the kind of religious bigotry that we have seen from her towards past court nominees, interrogating their Catholicism and other Democrats on the committee doing the same thing.
They're trying to make the religious faith of Amy Barrett the central issue.
This is a form of bigotry. Let's just call that out, it is anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-faith bigotry.
Kamala Harris should renounce it. Joe Biden should renounce and every Democrat should do the same Martha.
Do you think, I mean from what I see, it sounds like they're shifting.
They're getting much more into the question of health care and shying away from this.
Nancy Pelosi said do not bring up religion in this hearing.
I mean I'm sensing that they think that this is a political mistake for them and that they actually might not go there.
It would absolutely be not only a political mistake but it would be against the constitution.
The constitution says there are no religious tests for office but this questioning of Amy Barrett's faith about her adoption for heaven's sake, questioning whether people like her meeting religious believers,
好吧,那我就不谈了,我们会在下周的副总统辩论会上讨论这个问题。罗伊诉韦德案怎么样?
我很感兴趣的是,我们昨晚听到乔・拜登说,他认为艾米・巴雷特是个好人,可能是个好法官。
我们听他们降低了这个问题的重要性。你怎么看?
我可以先说卡玛拉・哈里斯的一件事吗。我是说她的立场发生了改变。
她此前表示,她对法院填塞计划持开放态度。现在她不回答这个问题。
她有很多问题需要解答,我希望她能向哈里斯参议员保证。
我希望她说,她不会像以前一样,对过去的法院候选人带有宗教偏执,审问他们的天主教和委员会中其他正在做这件事的民主党人。
他们试图把艾米・巴雷特的宗教信仰作为中心议题。
这是一种偏见。我们就说出来吧,这是反天主教、反基督教、反信仰的偏见。
卡玛拉・哈里斯应该放弃,拜登应该放弃,每个民主党人都应该这样做。
你觉得呢,我是说,从我看来,他们好像在转移话题。
他们对医疗保健的问题越来越关注,而且在回避这个问题。
南希・佩洛西表示,不要在听证会上提起宗教问题。
我感觉他们认为这是一个政治错误,他们实际上可能不会这样做。
这绝对不仅是一个政治错误,而且是违反宪法的。
根据宪法,入职不需要进行宗教测试,但对艾米・巴雷特信仰的质疑,对人们是否希望她会见宗教信徒的质疑,
暂无注释
听写注意
1.为防止灌水听写至少要输入超过10个单词方可提交同时听写内容不能粘贴;
2.标点符号不用填写,听写比对会忽略掉标点符号;
3.单词与单词之间要留有空格,同时数字(年月或金额)请用阿拉伯数字。
可友留言
加载中...
我来说2句
抱歉,您需要先登录后才能留言
谁正在听写
得分最高
最新听写
热门听写